Bluevista99

Maas

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:

• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• Simplified Manual of Style

Disambiguation pages

Please note that disambiguation pages like Maas are meant to help readers find a specific existing article quickly and easily. For that reason, they have guidelines that are different from articles. From the Wikipedia:Disambiguation dos and don'ts you should:

• Only list articles that readers might reasonably be looking for
• Use short sentence fragment descriptions, with no punctuation at the end
• Use exactly one navigable link ("blue link") in each entry that mentions the title being disambiguated
• Only add a "red link" if used in existing articles, and include a "blue link" to an appropriate article
• Do not pipe links (unless style requires it) – keep the full title of the article visible
• Do not insert external links or references - Wikipedia is not a business directory

There are several articles that mention "Manufacturing as a service" but none suggest that MaaS is a common acronym. If you would like to add the acronym to an existing article (Design manufacture service or Design manufacture service?), preferably with a reference that supports its use, then it could be added back to the DAB page with that link.

Thank you. Leschnei (talk) 14:24, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

July 2022

Hello, I'm Hey man im josh. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Andrew Wakefield seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:43, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Attlee

Good catch here, thanks! DBaK (talk) 22:13, 15 February 2025 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wheelie bike, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page LIFE. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

March 2025

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. FMSky (talk) 08:47, 1 March 2025 (UTC)

@FMSky Thanks for your courtesy note. Let me reassure you that I completely reject partisan editing. All of the edits you have deleted are cited factual. They may be uncompromisingly truthful, but none are partisan. I'm now wondering if maybe you have torn through your list of jobs so quickly that you didn't give yourself enough time to read the deliberately verbose & explanatory edit summaries that I had left. If you had read them before deleting the legitimate, non-partisan, encyclopedic content I had added, you may have had second thoughts and left the content where it belonged. Meanwhile, I've put a more detailed reply on your talk page. Hope to hear from you soon. Cheers! Bluevista99 (talk) 16:58, 1 March 2025 (UTC)

Is really not that complicated, we don't use descriptions like "notorious fraudster" (link), "noted anti-vaccine agititors" (link), "trenchant hard-core fascist, racist, anti-Semite, and holocaust denier" (link, and in this case it wasn't even sourced), see WP:NPOV. And regarding your edit here (link), that was simply unsourced ---FMSky (talk) 01:55, 2 March 2025 (UTC)

Just gonna add a couple points here. First, see Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Words to watch#contentious labels. Second, with a couple exceptions, editors can remove what they want from their own talk pages. TornadoLGS (talk) 04:58, 2 March 2025 (UTC)