Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Love Our Prophet
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Reactions to Innocence of Muslims. (non-admin closure) TheSpecialUser TSU 01:23, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Love Our Prophet (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Apart from failing WP:GNG (not a single hit on Google news for this) None of the sources mention a "Love our prophet day" Darkness Shines (talk) 20:15, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:02, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:02, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: I have moved the article to more common title "Love Prophet Day". --SMS Talk 20:31, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete WP:NOTNEWS. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 07:24, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep The current title is not accurate, the actual/commonly used name is "Ishq-e-Rasool" as can be found in several notable media sources online. Moreover, this was declared a public holiday by the government of Pakistan which makes this a notable event 'Ishq-e-Rasool (pbuh)' day: Government announces holiday on September 21 Mar4d (talk) 10:26, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Per Mar4d. It is a official and notable holiday, The name should be changed to "Ishq-e-Rasool" instead of deletion. --Farah DesaiTalk 12:35, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- What do the sources give in the way of coverage? Would a redirect to Public holidays in Pakistan not make more sense? Darkness Shines (talk) 13:03, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to Reactions to Innocence of Muslims. Other observations (not necessarily directly relevant to AfD): The article doesn't make it clear whether this was a one-time event or is intended to be a yearly observance; adding it to Public holidays in Pakistan is appropriate only if sources confirm it's going to be observed in future years. Also, the article requires extensive cleanup work for NPOV; everyone needs to remember that Wikipedia's style guidelines for Islam-related articles (see MOS:ISLAM), as well as the general demands of WP:NPOV, require us to treat subjects like this in a strictly neutral manner that neither promotes nor denigrates the tenets and personalities of this or any other faith. — Richwales 06:35, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge per Richwales above. There's plenty of coverage in reliable sources around the day, for example here and here and here. But there's absolutely no indication that it's an annual thing, and as such is connected exclusively with Reactions to Innocence of Muslims. Merge and redirect because it does not warrant a separate article under WP:NOTNEWS. --Batard0 (talk) 12:57, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 01:31, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 00:55, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 01:11, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge per above. TBrandley 01:36, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.